Wednesday 26 May 2010

Capello's Contract Changes Reflect Uncertainty Over FA

In amongst all the, now customary, trivial tit-bits of World Cup stories leading up to the tournament proper, were reports of a significant change to Fabio Capello’s contract to manage England. Following the announcement and the ensuing uproar caused by the Capello fronted commercial scheme, a fantasy football style game based primarily on Capello’s own assessment of his players’ performances, the FA and Capello responded quickly to the media’s protestations by withdrawing from the scheme altogether.

Less publicised was the announcement that the two year break option in Capello’s four year contract – the break period coinciding with the end of the 2010 tournament – had been deleted at Capello’s request. No-one from the media seemed to link the two events. After all, it wasn’t the first time that an England manager tried to cash in on his position with some ill thought out commercial venture – Glenn Hoddle’s world cup diary in 1998 springs to mind. However, following a successful and encouraging start to his England tenure, characterised by Capello’s own strong sense of discipline, on and off the field, and his pronouncements on being focused fully on the job, using players who were both fit and in-form, RTG detects a worrying change in Capello’s attitude to the job.

Yes, the selection of players who are half fit and those that have played no part in any Capello selected squad might appear to be hypocritical to some or, they might just be acceptance that the ideals as set out by himself on taking on the England job cannot possibly be delivered in the real world. As Capello showed when managing Real Madrid, in his dealings with Beckham, at first discarding him very publicly and then bringing him back when Beckham responded with hard work and determination, he is a man who is not so proud as to admit a mistake – even if only to himself. This is encouraging and for once the media responded positively, “He’s learning about international football like any other new manager” and “He’s never been in this position before” being typical comments from the paid pundits. Had this occurred during a less than successful qualifying campaign RTG wonders if they might have been a little less sympathetic and torn him to shreds instead. But that’s a story for next season perhaps.

No, the worrying aspect is Capello’s clear concern on his job security, so much so that he felt compelled to enter into that ill-advised commercial venture. With Triesman’s high profile departure, adding to the recent somewhat furtive resignation of the FA’s CEO, Ian Watmore, it is clear not all is well at the FA. Now, RTG does not know what organisational power blocks exist within the FA. What it does know though is that they exist, within itself and in relation to the Premier League. That’s pretty normal. It is also clear, that if you add in former CEO Adam Crozier’s experience as an agent of change within the FA – he talked at great length about the need for the FA to modernise its outlook and organisation – the FA is not a place to be if you want to change the 130 or so years old institution. But change it must, as the guardian of the game in this country it is has been running, more or less, on the same basis in its entire history. And this is the most worrying aspect of Capello’s recent actions: his realisation that the FA is a “sick” institution with little or no prospect of re-inventing itself to deliver its key goals. That is to develop the grass roots of the sport, creating an environment which enables world class footballers to be produced and, therefore, a team that can actually win tournaments. If you were working for the FA, wouldn’t you feel insecure too?

The Keeper
He Stands Tall and Firm...ooer!

No World Cup build up would be complete without the release of the official England Team World Cup song. Who could forget the rousing tones of “Back Home” in 1970 or John Barnes in da house for “World in Motion” in 1990. Well, the Keeper has some bad news to report. The build up to South Africa will not be complete on account of the fact that there will be no 2010 England World Cup song released. Your modern day England footballer is no longer willing to make themselves look like an idiot for posterity’s sake anymore (well not intentionally anyway) and they certainly don’t get out of bed for the mere tens of thousands of pounds that a hit record earns these days.

But don’t despair out there. El Tel (formerly known as Terry Venables) sporting the very latest in outdated goatee beards has taken it upon himself to release his own World Cup song; a rather laboured version of Elvis Presley’s “If I can Dream” which actually sounds like it would have done had Elvis himself recorded it seconds before he passed away on the loo. Filmed for Sky Sports on the roof of that footballing Mecca, the O2 Centre, to promote the record, El Tel’s interview was sadly interrupted by the arrival on the roof of his backing group, the London Philharmonic Orchestra. “Sorry chaps”, said Tel, “it’s the London Filler…..Fillar….Fill Up…I’ve got to go!”. I think Tel you meant The London Fillyerpockets Orchestra.

Maradonna’s predictably stormy and somewhat unpredictable reign as Argentina’s head coach continued as he accidentally ran over a camera man’s leg this week. Calling on his usual reservoir of understanding and humility with regard to the plight of other less deified members of the human race, he was heard to say, “What an asshole you are. How can you put your leg there where it can get run over man?” Strange, because we England fans thought he was the expert at putting limbs in places they shouldn’t be.

Manchester City meanwhile seem to be hell bent on signing one of Don Fabio’s up and coming stars, James Milner. As with Chelsea a few years ago City seem determined to over bid for good English talent. It started at £20M rising to £30M and currently topping around £40M – the same sort of figure Arsenal are likely to end up getting for Cesc Fabregas. You know what the Keeper is saying. If it ended up at £100M, why should it matter? He can join the Glen Johnsons, Scott Parkers, Steve Sidwells and Sean Wright-Phillips of previous years who chased the big bucks to Chelsea and languished on the bench for the next few seasons at the expense of unfulfilled promise. It could be important to bag the best English talent, though, in the coming seasons as UEFA’s new rules on home grown talent kick in. City apparently made a £30M bid for Adam Johnson last week before they realised he was actually already one of their own players.

It was refreshing to be marshalled through the FA Cup final on ITV for the first time by the combination of Clive Tyldesley and Jim Beglin. When Didier Drogba’s shot rattled the Pompey cross bar to see the ball apparently cross the line, Messrs Tyldsley and Beglin launched into a frenzy of protestation. “It was over Clive”, “Definitely over Jim”. Then Clive consulted his TV commentator’s what-do-we-say-in-these-circumstances instruction book and decided to launch into a scathing attack on Fifa for not allowing technology. “It only takes a few seconds to confirm Jim, why oh why don’t we use it?” The TV replay dutifully followed 40 seconds later and, after several different camera angles were examined, revealed that the ball clearly hadn’t crossed the line after all. Jim Beglin immediately started back pedalling at a rate that would have taken him comfortably rear-first up Mount Everest. “Actually looking at it again Clive I’m not sure it was over”. But our Clive, clearly on a roll by now and enjoying his foray into the role of ‘commentator/technology bandwagon jumper, was not to be put off his stride. “It’s madness Jim. We have the technology. It just takes a few minutes so why don’t we use it?” At which point it became clear, after discussing the issue for n minutes that, in fact, Messrs Tyldesley and Beglin had illustrated exactly why goal line technology has been resisted. That is, a perfectly good decision made by a well positioned linesman prevented the need for unnecessary hold ups to play and a cumbersome and time-wasting, on-field player-appeal system. Thanks Clive.

Thursday 20 May 2010

Triesman: Mail on Sunday Treachery

Question? Why would the Mail on Sunday, a paper that claims to be, at best, “batting for Britain”, in reality, a vehicle for fuelling the angst of “Little Englanders”, decide to derail England’s 2018 World Cup bid?

When you think of the potential benefits the world cup would bring to both the footballing and economic development of the UK, you have to start believing that evil forces are at work. For an organisation to have taken upon itself to have set up Lord Triesman in this way - and published transcripts of Triesman’s words would suggest relaxed speculation rather than outright accusations – there must be ulterior motives in compromising the national (istic!) interests in such a way.

Is RTG starting a conspiracy theory? Actually, we are and we believe there is good reason to do so.


"There is one certain fact about debt, it has to be repaid or refinanced. The debt mountains are owned and therefore the clubs are owned by either financial institutions - some of which are in terrible health - or very rich owners who are not bound to stay, or not very rich owners who are also not bound to stay. As we all know today, finance institutions have finally become highly risk-aware. They break debt into smaller packages mixed with other more or less toxic debts and sell these impenetrable instruments on. This poses very tangible dangers. Not only is debt at high-risk levels, we are also in a period when transparency lies in an unmarked grave. There is little point in thinking this now affects everyone except football. I predict, especially in today's financial climate, it cannot go on."

FA Chairman, Lord Triesman, October 2008

Since RTG started publishing in 2007, it has been looking for an empathetic voice at the highest levels of football administration. We don’t claim to know Lord Triesman personally, or professionally, but his public pronouncements of the inequities and indebtedness of the game in this country were starting to highlight the differing objectives of the bodies governing football. That is why he made many enemies in the game, particularly in the Premier League - principally, Sir David Richards and Richard Scudamore. Yes, the same Dave Richards who was instrumental in turning Sheffield Wednesday from an established Premier League team into a struggling and debt-ridden League 1 side. . And yes, the Richard Scudamore who, in the past, RTG has been passionately disapproving of for his short-termist policies.

The warning flags should be raised yet again by football supporters to say that everything is not right with the governance of the game. Anybody within the football establishment who dares to question the old order, be it a Lord Triesman or an Adam Crozier, seem to end their relationship with the FA with their heads bowed in shame. It seems that the word “change”, so popular with the politicians in recent weeks, is an anathema to the world of football administration. That is, anybody who dares challenge the (very) old order, is dispensed with at the first politically expedient opportunity.

Conspiracy theories feed off attempts to explain why shocking events happen. They are a way of rationalising historical happenings that pour scorn on the official explanation or pronouncement. However, RTG feels we can identify how Lord Triesman entered into a seemingly innocent, but recorded, conversation with a “friend” and, at the same time, ended up losing his job.

  1. He criticised the so-called ‘fit and proper’ test that the Premier League put in place to, supposedly, regulate ownership in football. RTG say he has been more than vindicated on that score but, note, vigorously opposed by Richard Scudamore.
  2. He raised huge concerns about the indebtedness of football clubs but, again, totally rebutted, by Richard Scudamore
  3. The other bidders for 2018 (Russia in particular, since Spain logically should not get it after hosting it more recently) have a lot to gain from this and probably a lot of money to throw at it. Let’s park that one there for now but presumably you get RTG’s point (and yet more Abramovich involvement?).

"The fit and proper persons test does not do the job sufficiently robustly. A review is now inevitable because football clubs are not mere commodities. They are the abiding passion of their supporters. We forget that at our peril."

FA Chairman, Lord Triesman, October 2008

Is RTG going mad or what? Whoever tries to change football for the good seems, after a decent while, to get their mandated balls cut off. And by ‘the good’ we mean for the benefit of all football supporters through equal competition. But, look at the huge amount of money now involved in football, and it is hard not to subscribe to conspiracy theories. We clearly have some unsavoury characters involved in running and influencing football. Sadly, RTG believes, we have just lost someone who may have forged a better path for football.

Sign Up Here To Support Reclaim the Game


The Keeper

...he's got it covered!

My mate’s wife’s brother-in-law was installing a new kitchen at Carlos Anceolotti’s house when he overheard Carlos’ son saying someone called “Stevie G” was on the telephone asking for him. My mate’s w’s-b-i-l etc managed to listen in for a while and heard them debating whether it was better to sign contracts before or after the world cup. It’s a done deal. You heard it here first!

Yes folks, it’s transfer rumour rubbish time! This year’s opening to the transfer window is again spurred on by the speed of various trophy laden Playstation managers to fuel their own fantasies via websites specifically set up for that purpose (see football rumours.co.uk). The fact that the rumour mill is also given an additional spin by footie journalists who, post season, are having trouble filling column inches prior to the world cup is neither here nor there.

Here’s what the Keeper thinks will happen: a repeat of last summer’s trading. That is, a record year again in transfer spending, but actually very few transfers take place. Records will be broken only because Manchester City will overpay on stroppy prima donnas, Abramovich will let loose a fraction of his billions to try to realise his European ambitions and… everybody else will be trying to stick to whatever their earnings and budgets are in the current economic climate. But the Keeper also predicts that the market might go mad, if England goes on to lift the World Cup, based on the feel good factor that would be engineered. Hmm..ok. Stick with the original prediction bit.

Talking of rumours and Stevie G, he and his wife have had to issue a press statement to deny the rumours that have been circulating over the ‘net in the last couple of weeks. You know the one: Stevie has apparently impregnated a 16 yeard old, whilst his wife, Alex Curran, has supposedly been having an affair with a Derby County player. What utter rubbish! The Keeper knows for a fact she has never been to Derby.

A big up to Fulham, their management and their fans for doing England proud as the lone carriers of the flag into a potential European trophy winning position. Most commentators described their heart breaking extra time loss to Atletico Madrid as a “plucky and proud” glorious failure. Given that Atletico’s first goal was offside and their winner a flukey own goal, The Keeper thinks that the Fulham fans would have been justified in being hugely disappointed. Panning around the crowds, tears from the fat middle aged men, as seems the norm these days, were duly expected. But no. Not even from the “way past your bed time” kids. Their stoicism amidst their disappointed acceptance was laudable.

Sadly, there was one exception. The TV crowd scenes focused, as usual, on a celebrity “I only go to finals” person. In this case, Lilly Allen, who was seen blubbing away in the stands looking to all intents and purposes like she should have been more worried about the amorous advances of Pepe Le Pew. But then if you were faced with the prospect of sitting next to Keith “look at me, I’m almost as famous as my daughter” Allen, surrounding yourself with Eau de Skunk might prove to be a very worthwhile exercise.

Congratulations to the likeable (so far, at least) Carlos Anceolotti for clinching the domestic double in his first season in England. A remarkable achievement. But sadly, The Keeper just can’t help but contrast the images of the second highest paid players in the world holding aloft their cups of victory along New Kings Road, with those of old babushkas holding out their begging cups in countless Russian cities and towns. As a French writer (it was Honore de Balzac – OK, so I looked it up!) once said: ”behind every great fortune, lies a great crime”.

Monday 10 May 2010

Owners or Administrators. Are Any of Them 'Fit and Proper'?

For those of us who include a study of the league tables as part of our Sunday morning ablutions, tracking the form of clubs has become rather more convoluted over the last few seasons by the need to refer constantly to one or more asterisks alongside various teams throughout the league tables.

Even those of us who like to think that they are football ‘savvy’ are left in some bewilderment – Crystal Palace minus 10 points, Southampton minus 10 points, Chester minus, don’t know they’ve disappeared, Luton minus 30 points, Leeds minus 10, then another minus 15, Portsmouth about to be deducted 9 points etc.

What’s striking about the deductions is their variability. Why the different deductions? They are all for basically the same thing. They overspent and, quite rightly, this is tantamount to cheating. But why the disparities? What exactly are the rules governing points deductions and why have they been applied with additional sanctions in some cases? Yes - RTG knows that additional rules have been broken in the method and circumstances of clubs facing administration – hence more points deducted – but you would need to be a forensic financial analyst to understand exactly what rule is being broken. Why will Portsmouth get a nine point reduction as opposed to the ten points for other Football League clubs?

All this does is illustrate that there is a paucity of clarity from the FA, Premiership and Football League. Equally so, it represents not just the bust phase of the football boom and bust show, but the total lack of leadership from those that govern football.


"We have to be careful we don't adopt Michel Platini's and the French view of debt, which is that it is bad. Debt is inevitable. You say debt is not healthy but debt, of course, to a degree is healthy. If we are not careful we'll end up where no one is allowed a holiday in France who has a mortgage in England."


Richard Scudamore, October 2008

So Richard Scudamore, like so many fat cats – sorry – corporate professionals – is happy to sit back and do almost nothing to pick up large six figure salaries and large six figure bonuses (pushing his salary well into seven figures) for doing basically nothing. He believes that football is a corporate dog eat dog world and that clubs that are mismanaged will be punished for their profligacy. For some reason, he doesn’t seem to realise that his organisation has an active role in ensuring clubs have the right management with the Premiership’s (alleged) ‘fit and proper’ tests. How is it then that these tests allowed four (or is it five?) different and clearly not fit owners to take over Portsmouth in a few months? Clearly the Premiership applies rules which are meaningless at best, bordering on criminal at worst.

On top of that, two of the world’s biggest clubs, Manchester United and Liverpool, have been allowed to mortgage their very existence to allow a handful of disinterested American ‘carpet baggers’ to enrich themselves at the expense of loyal supporters. It is in the ownership and continuing health of all clubs that Mr Scudamore should be judged.


"We have a cosmopolitan approach to players and a cosmopolitan approach to ownership and that is paying off."


Richard Scudamore, January 2007

His last re-signing of the Sky TV deals, a deal that merely continues a 20 year association with Sky at a slightly raised fee (which earned him a £250k - £500k bonus according to whichever report you believe) are the easy parts of his job. The hard parts are to have leadership in the areas which are causing supporters the most anguish: How to ensure a fair and exciting competition? How to prevent the carpet baggers? In reality, how do you ensure the future health of the game? It’s the easiest thing in the world to fly around in first class and sign deals which are just inflation adjusted contracts for the same things. In truth, clubs like Liverpool and Manchester United have done just as much, if not more, than Mr Scudamore in spreading the word to foreign fields.

Mr Scudamore, earn your millions by tackling the difficult issues!

Sign Up Here To Support Reclaim the Game


The Keeper
...he's got it covered!


We’re all trembling with anticipation and tension as the final stages of the season draw out to decide who will be crowned champions of “the most exciting league in the world”™. Entering the final stages, it was a three way race between the three clubs who have won 16 of the 17 “most competitive league in the world”™ titles. Entering the final weekend, it is a race involving the two clubs who have won the last 5 titles between themselves. How those Scottish fans must be envying us!

And if that’s not enough excitement for football fans, we’ve got the FIFA World Cup™ coming up in about six weeks time. It’s come around so quickly again – feels like a matter of months, rather than the four years since Germany’s 2006 tournament when we England fans were sweating over the fitness of several players, including the now obligatory metatarsal troubles, as well as the English media’s wildly optimistic expectations of an England win. Or was that 2002? Or 1998? Plus ca change, as they say on Groundhog day.

Talking of World Cups and South Africa 2010, recent reports following the death of apartheid advocate Eugene Terre’Blanche seem to suggest that the world cup will be played out during a civil war. In fact, the threat of violence is being used to explain poor ticket sales for the Greatest Sporting Event in the World™. Trust us it has absolutely nothing to do with airlines doubling/tripling flight prices, ditto hoteliers for rooms (if available at all) and ticket prices that make Wembley seats appear like a day out to watch your local pub team compete in the inter-brewery play-offs. FIFA don’t even have the comfort of over priced sales to corporate saps because of the global slowdown. Our hearts bleed!

But hurrah! It might just be wishful thinking on the part of certain areas of the media but talk is that Capello wants to take David Beckham along as a motivation to the rest of the selected England squad. That may just be the managerial stroke of genius that could propel England to the world title. After all, wouldn’t you be inspired by someone who gets paid five to 10 times as much as you do for playing intermittently for an English League 1 side and who acts as a Milanese seat warmer in between? Imagine all that invaluable experience of last 16/quarter final exits: the missed penalties, the jumping out of tackles, the petulant sending offs, the shirt sales. On the downside, the players might just be overawed by the presence of this high achiever. But hey – here’s another inspirational idea: why not complete the Hello! package by getting Mrs Beckham to come along as squad dietician. At least no-one will be puking before a match with nerves!

Those of you out there who desperately want to see England win something before you shuffle off this mortal coil—yes you who would dare to suggest that 11 players out on the pitch who are fit and possess the in-built belief that they can actually win something would be a better tactic to follow, can only hope, like us, that Capello really is the man to shake off the shackles of FA mismanagement and make the difference this year. Otherwise will we once again be contemplating the usual FA post-mortem in July that, no doubt, will sound something like the closing scene in the movie ‘Burn After Reading’ where the CIA superior is talking to his underling:


CIA Superior: What did we learn, Palmer?
CIA Officer: I don't know, sir.
CIA Superior: I don't fuckin' know either. I guess we learned not to do it again.
CIA Officer: Yes, sir.
CIA Superior: I'm fucked if I know what we did.
CIA Officer: Yes, sir, it's, uh, hard to say
CIA Superior: Jesus Fucking Christ.

Jesus Fucking Christ indeed!