E is for Elite Not Education

The beginning of next season sees the introduction of the Elite Player Performance Plan (EPPP) which changes radically the way leading clubs scout, sign, coach and develop young players. The relative under performance of the current England team, the spiralling transfer fees and the scrutiny of coaching in the game in general means that the subject of young player development is right at the forefront of issues affecting the modern game in England. There is little doubt that the current system does not develop young players of sufficient quantity or quality to turn the England team into potential world beaters so the very fact that efforts are being made to change it is perhaps a step in the right direction. However, RTG has some severe reservations about the plan given that it seems to favour the ‘elite’ Premier League clubs and appears to ignore what RTG considers is a fundamental factor missing from current player development – education.

EPPP itself has been cooked up by the Premier League and the FA which suggests that most of the upside is going to benefit the Premier League rather than football in general. The Football League clubs did vote in favour of EPPP by 46 to 22 but that in itself does not necessarily prove they are behind it. In truth, there was a certain degree of Hobson’s choice about it as the Premier League, pending the vote, had suspended £5.4M of its annual solidarity payment to the Football League that is set aside for youth development. RTG tends to treat with cynicism, therefore, any change to the game initiated by the Premier League as it invariably tends to involve money or influence passing from the lower levels of English football into their already bloated pockets and egos respectively. And EPPP is likely no different. However, leaving cynicism aside for a moment let’s look at the positives. Firstly, it removes the rule banning clubs from recruiting from beyond a 60-minute journey radius for players under the age of 16 (or 90 minutes for over 16s). While it is easy to see the reasons behind this rule, it was never a level playing field. Physical geography and proximity to other clubs made this rule a nonsense. Secondly, EPPP presents coaches with much more face time with young players than before. Naturally this is a good thing.

Another key change is the end of the tribunal system under which disputed academy transfers are currently resolved. The Independent describes the detail extremely well here but the basic essence is that there will be in place set rules for compensating clubs when one of their academy players switches clubs where initial fees are far lower than at present but downstream earnings are potentially more depending on the success of the player.

But in RTG’s opinion education is just as important to the development of players but glaringly omitted from any plans the Premier League have made under EPPP. La Masia at Barcelona and Ajax’s academy could both be cited as shining examples of how to develop young players to a consistently high standard. Both of these place huge importance on educational development as an integral part of the make-up of a good footballer.

The brain is like any other muscle in the body. If used and exercised it works better. If ever you wanted a clear example of the educational failure of English players, look at England’s performance against a relatively inexperienced German team in the World Cup in 2010. Yes, England was unlucky not to be awarded a goal that would have evened the game up at 2-2. But even at 1-2, we were not out of it. If the England players had had the intelligence to adapt to the situation the game was in, they might have been able to weather the storm and respond. Instead we were treated to the embarrassment of watching English players mindlessly charging forward while the Germans calmly picked them off at the back. Sorry everybody if it sounds a bit harsh but the 'Golden Generation' was simply too thick to ever win anything.

RTG has long been a fan of a co-ordinated approach to coaching and development covering all aspects of the game from grass roots upward. We applauded the fact that the National Football Centre at Burton was finally being developed only to find that it is aimed at developing coaches and referees not players. Why we need a multi-million pound centre just for this is beyond our current understanding. Just like EPPP this is yet another stand-alone initiative in a totally disjointed and mismanaged process with absolutely no intelligent planning involved.

If the culture in English football continues to mistrust education – to the point where if you read a broadsheet newspaper you are considered to be gay! – then, EPPP or no EPPP, folks get used to a disappointing summer in 2012…2014...2016…

So don't be a dummy! Sign up and Reclaim the Game

A Phoney Phase to a Phoney Competition – Part One

It’s 17 days since the World Cup final and 31 since England’s exit. The post mortems have been held – and how. RTG was rather miffed that it wasn’t solicited amongst the multitude of vox pop interviews that even had contributions from family pets. This was on top of the interviews of just about every professional player of the last 30-40 years. Admittedly, it was enjoyable trying to put names to faces in Sky Sports News’ endless procession of fat, balding blokes being wheeled out for their jaundiced views of England’s failures.

Now the media’s attention is firmly focused on filling column inches and airtime minutes with news from the “eagerly awaited” transfer window. The dramatic days-‘til-end counter, the claims and counter denials, the will-they, won’t-they speculation and above all – the inaction! Currently, much wind, but no sail (sale?).


“If you offered me 15th place now, I'd take it!”

Wolves' Manager, Mick McCarthy 27th July 2010

Whilst it is not unreasonable that Sky, in particular, should attempt to sex-up the speculation, in support of their huge investment in the sport, this close season, rather like the last one, is proving to be ‘phoney’. There really isn’t that much going on compared to pre 2008 levels.

The credit crunch continues to impact the financial resources available to virtually every club. Only Manchester City, Real Madrid and, probably, Chelsea have or will spend big in this window. The rest of the Premiership, at least for the moment, is merely re-arranging resources with minor net spend. Liverpool, for instance, have taken a couple of out of contract players and single figure million pound players and, reportedly, will have to fund any further transfer activity out of sales. Equally, Manchester United’s two new recruits have been partly funded by sales for a net spend of around £3 million. United have also reduced their headcount by releasing players and loaners.

Manchester City on the other hand has so far spent £75 million – with plenty more in the pipeline. Indeed, it is widely anticipated that they will rack up spending to over £200 million in just two summer transfer windows. One of City’s new boys, the very ordinary Barca reserve, Yaya Toure, is on a contract that pays him around £1 million a month. Let’s put that into perspective. If recent reports are correct, Wayne Rooney has earned himself a rise in his wages that will pay him about 60% of what Mr Toure earns. Or another way, premiership new boys, Blackpool, have just announced their record transfer purchase: for the princely sum of £1 million.

This is a gross distortion of the football playing field and results in a gross distortion of the Premiership as a competition. What chance do promoted Premiership clubs have in this environment? What chance for that matter do other clubs have when one or two fortunate clubs have no financial boundaries? With the ever increasing disparity between what Premiership teams earn and what the rest do, the financial penalties that follow relegation are increasingly scary. Wages are up because one or two clubs are unencumbered in their spending to lure players on over-inflated contracts. Ditto transfer fees. To stay in the Premiership is the prime objective of all but a handful of clubs. Just ask the supporters of Charlton, Leeds, Southampton, Barnsley, Bradford City, Nottingham Forest, Crystal Palace and several others to see what awaits a relegated club who don’t bounce back immediately. Financial implosion and further relegation is the norm.

Is it any wonder then that the amount of defensively minded and over physical games has been increasingly boring football supporters throughout the Premiership over the last few years? Is it any wonder then that English players, in general, develop to be so uncomfortable in possession and the need to distribute that ball at break-neck speed, leads to a less than intelligent approach to the game. With so much at stake it can’t be a surprise to us that teams are going to be negative in their approach and this is a direct result of this phoney distortion of the football market.

In a previous article, RTG had already posed the question about ‘what is the difference between Portsmouth’s overspending – to their financial ruin and relegation – and Manchester City (or Chelsea), who consistently overspend – but just so happen to have an open ended cheque book’? The answer: a 10 point deduction. RTG continues this discussion next week….

The Keeper

…he’s a’puffin and a’pantin in pre-season!

The Keeper wishes to extend his own personal thank you to Tottenham for being the first club to make a stand and ban the vuvuzela from White Hart Lane for next season. Official club sources stated that they were concerned the noise might drown out important safety or security announcements. The Keeper wonders could they mean such statements as, “Put your hands up Harry, you’re under arrest” or “You are not obliged to say anything…” Neighbours Arsenal also followed their rivals soon afterwards in banning the vuvuzela for totally different reasons it seems. Rumour has it they were more concerned they might wake up some of the older patrons from their afternoon slumber in the ‘library’.

South Africa’s Zulu war trumpet was not a problem for Spain and The Keeper heartily congratulates them for their first ever World Cup success and for introducing us to their concept of ‘tiki taka’ football. The new world champions are well worthy of having named their own individual style of the game. In contrast, English players are more normally associated with ‘tacky tacky’, more on account of their terrible dress sense and their appalling taste in tattoos and jewellery. However, not to be outdone, they did come back from South Africa having stamped their own unique brand on the beautiful game, known as ‘humpa lumpa’ football!

Still, at least England did at least make it to the knockout stages unlike France who didn’t even make it past the group stage. It was only after the tournament, however, that the Keeper learned that phrases such as “inept”; “below par”; “too few scoring opportunities”; “over too early”; “lack of belief in the man on top”. were nothing to do with French football but actually describing Franck Ribery’s and Karim Benzema’s performance with the underage prostitute they allegedly procured in 2009 and for which they are now facing charges. It seems Franck Ribery’s own brother-in-law is also facing charges for his part in the procurement of said underage prostitute. Now that really is ‘tacky tacky’.

Post World Cup issues have come to the fore for England too, not least in the withdrawal of sponsorship from long-standing Team England partner, Nationwide. Ever the shrewd business operator, the FA felt compelled to rely on England’s outstanding World Cup performance to hold out on Nationwide for a bit more cash after the event. Little surprise then that the building society chose, not only to pay less money, but actually withdraw from the deal altogether after England’s demise in South Africa. Hope rests on rumours that one of the big internet search engines is waiting in the wings to add their support to Team England. Given the utter shambles exhibited once again in business negotiations by the FA, the Keeper feels the phrase ‘Ho-Hum’ might be more appropriate than Yahoo!

Time For Revolution in English Football

Following yet another dismal England failure in a major tournament, RTG is calling for a complete overhaul in the administration and running of football in this country. No more talk about tiredness, Winter breaks, technical ability or changes to the England management. Unless supporters want the discussion for the next 44 years to mirror those of the last 44 years, now is the time to have the courage to accept that the way the game is run is both archaic and anarchic and totally detrimental to the well-being of not just the national team but football in general.

“They [Holland, Germany and Spain] are the three nations who have won the greatest number of youth tournaments in the last four years. Can all this be put down to mere good luck? I don’t think so. We are witnessing a triumph for technical education programmes, sound management and good governance.”

Michel Platini, South Africa 2010

Currently, there are three distinct bodies running football in this country – all with their own agendas, all with their own objectives and all with an overriding aim couched in corporate rather than sporting terms. Any first year student of management studies could tell you that is a recipe for disaster. RTG believes there must be one body to govern football working to clear priorities and properly set objectives.

South Africa 2010 may not have been the most spectacular showcase for the game of football. But, if it showed us anything about international tournament football, it was that good coaching and intelligent players can produce a team that is far better than the sum of its parts. England, on paper, should have been more than a match for Germany and, man for man, should have stood comfortably shoulder to shoulder alongside the Dutch. However, when the chips were down against the Germans, the England players did not possess the thought-making process to understand what was going wrong and subsequently to put it right. It appeared that, running around like headless chickens and chasing shadows to show the ‘commitment’ and ‘passion’ that are so often quoted in relation to great England players was all they were capable of doing. And, in fact, that is all many simple-minded media pundits and commentators have believed to be required to win matches at this level for years.

Take Germany, as a good example (and why not since they are the most successful international European footballing nation). Following their failure to even get out of the group stage at Euro 2000, they revamped the structure of their coaching and administration as well as requiring Bundesliga teams to maintain a minimum number of home grown talent in each of their squads; together with a raft of other changes designed to help the development of the game. At the same time, England (who also went out at the same group stage) mindlessly contented themselves with a fortuitous single goal victory over the old enemy in one of the worst international matches RTG has ever witnessed.

In a similar vain, in 1976, Australia came back from the Montreal Olympic Games with no gold medals. That led to a root and branch analysis of what was wrong with sport in the country at all levels and ages. Consequently, they have punched way above their weight in every Olympics (and many other sports) since. In 1987, after suffering the humiliation of another comprehensive Ashes defeat, they did the same with cricket – the idea of being second best in their national sport simply not being acceptable. They didn’t lose the Ashes again until 2005. Likewise, English football needs to do the same with our national sport now. To do that it will have to acknowledge that the profit motive can no longer be the main driver behind how the game is run. It needs to set proper objectives and priorities for playing, coaching and governing the game in this country – and it needs to happen now.

Once a single governing body for football in England is established, RTG believes clear priorities for the game must be set out:

Priority 1: Participation. Football is our national sport and maximum participation is good for the health and well-being of the nation. Above all it must be fun to play to get the most out of it and we need to ensure that, at all ages and levels, the best possible facilities and standards of coaching are available - whatever that takes.

Priority 2: The England Team. If the first priority is met then we should be producing better players at grass roots level. But the club structure has to be revised in order that it helps the national team not hinders it. It’s obvious that the Premier League’s objectives could not be further from those of England right now. Clubs develop and buy players, quite justifiably, for their own economical and tactical needs not those of the national side. If available English players are not meeting those needs from the club’s perspective they will choose from elsewhere. And that’s exactly what they have been doing.

Priority 3: The Clubs. RTG has written plenty about this and there isn’t the space to address it fully here. But we need a fair competitive league structure that is not structured around how much money the owners are prepared to bankroll their clubs by or how much debt they feel they can get away with maintaining. The Premier League will argue that more money spent equals better players equals bigger gates. To use the German example again, grounds in Germany are full every week and clubs are not in debt. Likewise, their so-called ‘team in development’ reached the semi-finals of the World Cup – again!

These priorities represent some not insignificant changes. Like Germany, we may have to accept that our club performances in Europe will suffer in the short-term while genuinely talented players come through the ranks. In addition, qualification for the European Championships and World Cups at international level may have to be seen as a bonus rather than a given for a number of years. But removing that expectation from the shoulders of the team may, again like Germany, help them to over-achieve.

Help us to put pressure on the powers that be to reform the game by signing up here. We’ve paid handsomely for these past incompetents both financially and emotionally and we’ve earned our right to have our say.

The Keeper

….is hitting the beach instead of people!

As if England’s ignominious exit from the World Cup wasn’t bad enough already for English fans. We then had insult added to our pain by former Scotland manager Craig Brown. Mr Brown claimed that had Scotland qualified for the finals, they would have reached the quarter finals at least. This from a man who lamely responded after a 2-2 draw with the Faroe Islands with the immortal line “well, we did win the corner count”. The Keeper also recalled that Scotland later managed to lose to the mighty Faroe Islanders. Actually, on second thoughts, thank you Mr Brown, the memory of repeated humiliating Scottish failures to reach the European and World finals has cheered the Keeper up enormously.

Since the days of the sadly missed dishy Des Lynam, the Keeper has noticed that his punditry heirs have scaled ever further heights (or should that be plumb further depths?) in trying to outdo each other with the clever quips and puns. The Keeper’s favourite ‘waiting for the moment, but not worth the breath’ quotes have been Peter Drury’s USA – Ghana post match quip: “bye, bye, America sigh”. Ye-es. Sigh indeed. This was only just bettered in the cheesey stakes by Martin Keown’s comment on Japan’s “the lad Honda – played more like a Rolls Royce”.

TV pundits, however, much like tournament referees and assistants are not beyond reproach and paying for their mistakes. As the tournament progressed, various ‘expert’ panellists were culled from the initial line-ups. One of the first to go, thankfully, was the incomprehensible Emmanuel Adebayor, but much to the Keeper’s chagrin Alan Shearer remained. Now Mary Poppins, as he is known to the Geordie nation, didn’t, admittedly, attempt any cute quips or pathetic puns – to the Keeper’s knowledge – but his monotonous delivery and statement of the bleedin’ obvious was a continuous irritation. However, in response to the rest of the BBC panel’s discussion about Cesc Fabregas’ contribution in Spain’s triumph, he (boringly) told viewers that he had been outstanding “between the sticks” in the tournament and had made “two outstanding saves in the final”. Still Fabregas…..Casillas easily confused as they are only bloody foreigners to boring old Mary. Note: some media pundits were actually promoting him to be next England manager!

And finally, whilst the Keeper is sticking the proverbial boot into media pundits – this time journalists, Diego Forlan was, somewhat controversially, awarded the “Golden Ball” trophy. This, to commemorate him as the outstanding player of the tournament. Whilst admiring of Diego’s performances and his finishing as joint top scorer, the Keeper is perplexed at the overlooking of the handfuls of German, Spanish and Dutch players in favour of Diego. Until that is, it was explained that the assembled journalists in South Africa alone voted on the award. Enough said. Don’t think however, there would have been any controversy caused by the nationality of the “Golden Turd” award winner – any one from a number of Englishmen.

Back to the Classroom for Lessons Not Learnt

In just a few hours the game which will have a huge bearing on the future of football in this country kicks off. As usual, there are unlikely permutations which would allow England to progress with a draw, but basically, England need to win to get through to the last sixteen, and they need to win well to really get this world cup campaign back on track. Even a good win will not alter the feeling that 2010 is not going to be England’s year and, yet again, will stumble out limply within a couple of knock out rounds – at best.

As usual also, there will be the post mortems, the finding of a scape-goat to hang the nation’s angst onto and some more mindless optimism just before England embark on the Euro 2012 qualifying competition. Most people in football and knowledgeable supporters felt that there were grounds for optimism: we had the right manager and the world cup qualifying rounds went very well, and there had been an impressive win on German soil with an essentially England second XI. From the matches played since England’s only defeat in qualifying and especially the friendlies this year, it’s been downhill ever since.

Now press stories are circulating that irrespective of what happens, Don Fabio will be off, to be replaced by an Englishman, Roy Hodgson. There seems to be a pattern emerging here. Hire an expensive foreign manager, don’t give him the infrastructure and support to do his job properly, sack him amidst murmurings of disquiet over foreign managers, meanwhile continue to pay lip service to developing the game at lower levels and ignore the parlous state of football’s finances. Get another English manager, spurred on by the ‘little Englander’ media faction, and repeat process as before.

The truth is that millions of inches of column space and TV air time have been devoted to discussing where things go wrong and how to put them right. These have been discussed since England’s 1970 exit from the Mexican world cup. Managers have come and gone. Some were blatantly the wrong choice (Taylor, Keegan, Hoddle). Some were overlooked (Clough), but whatever and whoever the choice, RTG just can’t help coming back to the same conclusion: it’s yer basic raw talent, that’s the problem.

Clearly the ‘Golden Generation’ was totally oversold and optimistically assessed when coming through the ranks. Judging by the number of public relations gaffes that the current squad seem to be making, maybe they’re using the same PR outfit as Tony Hayward, BP’s beleaguered CEO! Let’s face it, most English footballers are pretty thick and even make a virtue of their gauche bling culture. When you see how most foreign players in England are better in English than many of their native counterparts and how English players abroad rarely pick up their local language, you realise how English players have largely ignored their off-field development. Indeed, reading an interview response by Jamie Redknapp, he boasted how his dad would encourage him to bunk off school to go training at Bournemouth.

What has resulted over the last forty years are successive generations of England players who are so singly dimensioned that you can’t really sense that any of them is going to read a game tactically and change things in real time on the field. They’ll just wait until half time and wait for the ‘hair-dyer’ treatment to be told what to do – that’s according to what all pundits say. And perhaps, RTG is finally coming to the nub of the problem. A failing education system in this country which rates the UK as one of the lowest in the developed world, allied to a celebrity culture which extols and promotes worthless people are taking their toll on our poorly educated footballing souls. Basically, England just can’t get clever players who have developed their minds to cope with adversity, to embrace change or to rationalise and deal with the pressures exerted on them by modern British society.

The Keeper

…it’s gone right through his hands

The Keeper has managed to prize himself away from his new HD TV (special offer at Tesco) to bring you his first report since the start of the World Cup. And what a week it’s been. After getting over the shock of seeing a Hyundai car drive on and score England’s first goal, the Keeper has maintained an almost permanent vigil in front of a festival of football – well, three football matches a day anyway and more of a village fete in the end than a festival. But surely the standard can only improve.

At the BBC it’s a case of recession, what recession? The Beeb seem to have upped sticks and headed mob handed over to South Africa for a last choo choo on the old gravy train before the cuts kick in. The Keeper entered into this televisual feast thinking that it was all about football but how wrong you can be. Chris Hollins has shown him that South Africa makes wine; two blokes who he’s never heard of are driving around in a bus to show that there are also exotic wild animals in South Africa and, favourite among favourites, Gabby Logan, reported live from the townships to show us that some poor people live in South Africa too, ‘you know’. What a shame that, when the Keeper wanted to learn something useful about football, all he had was Mick McCarthy, who, with the dourest of manner, sought only to repeat exactly what had just happened in full view on screen in a drab Yorkshire drawl - “Aw naw. Yer see ‘ees just missed t’pass and the chance of a counter by giving t’ball away again.” Yep, I just saw that Mick. Glad the licence fee is working hard for us over there. The Keeper’s viewing experience was also enhanced considerably by the presence of that doyen of football analysis, CBBC at Wayne Rooney’s live press conference when their incisive questioning revealed that, yes, he was missing his first born child.

The Keeper had serious reservations about the BBC’s choice of music to introduce Japan’s opening game against Cameroon – the soundtrack to ‘Merry Christmas Mr Lawrence’ which, for those who don’t know it, starred David Bowie as a rebellious PoW in a Japanese camp during the Second World War who dies a horrible death buried up to his neck in sand in the blazing heat of the day. Or, as Mick McCarthy would expertly summarise it: “Fer me ‘ees let isself down by getting ‘imself buried in t’sand up to ‘is neck and ‘ees 'anded the initiative right over t’ Japanese.” Aside from adding a huge oil slick to the fire of opinion that popstars can’t act to save their lives (see also Phil Collins in ‘Buster’, Mick Jagger in ‘Ned Kelly’), the film is a graphic illustration of the enormous cruelty exhibited by Japanese soldiers toward their captives in the appalling conditions of the PoW camps. The Keeper felt it was a rather lazy choice of music given the enlightened mood of friendliness and reconciliation of modern times (or pretend we do eh Major?) and perhaps one that should have been given a bit more thought by the BBC researcher as he sipped a glass of Stellenbosch Shiraz in his Cape Town hotel room.

The Keeper couldn’t get through his first World Cup report without mentioning the signature sound for the tournament, the vuvuzelas. Now, there have been rumblings afoot that certain viewers are not happy with the constant buzzing, resembling a swarm of angry bees, that provides the backing track to all the games. So much so in fact that there was talk of a Fifa ban on taking them into the stadium and the BBC (yes them again) were even prepared to offer a vuvuzela-free broadcast via the red button. The Keeper was astonished at this blatant disregard for the cultural heritage of the host nation. After all, what else is going to drown out the sound of that bloody awful brass band that insists on following England around?

There was more good news for the people of Southern Africa this week when it just happened that Princes Harry and Wills, who are known to love Africa ‘with a passion’, stopped by to do a bit of charity work in the region at the same time as the World Cup just happened to be taking place. What’s more, some ITV geezer just happened to have a couple of spares for the England match in Cape Town, where the Princes just happened to be at this point in their charity tour. Better start looking for a charity in Brazil in four years time, eh chaps?

Debatable PFA Demands too Narrow in View

The Professional Footballers’ Association (PFA) celebrated its 100th anniversary recently and some of the more intelligent press took the opportunity to provide some interesting historical analysis. Most pointed out that the original union formed with very limited aims. No, no talk in 1907 of freedom of contracts, image rights and intellectual copyright: instead the initial goal was simply to increase the maximum wage from five to seven pounds a week. Its subsequent success can best be measured by the fact that 50 years later, the maximum wage stood at just twelve pounds a week. Fifty years on from that, well, there is no maximum wage. Talk now is of how the “freedom of contract” has shifted the balance of power within the game to individual players and is expressed in six-figure weekly wages, and multi-million pound image rights, sponsorships and endorsements. This has given modern players the riches that, as a free market dictates, they deserve in comparison to other sports performers.

During the week though, there were reports of “demands” made by the PFA Chief Executive, Gordon Taylor, calling for a quota system on English players. At first glance, and at face value, these demands would appear to be a retro-step in the quality and entertainment value of English football. It is also unlikely in itself, as has been argued on RTG’s pages before, to produce the quality players to make the national team successful.

However, on closer inspection, what Gordon Taylor was really asking for was a quota on including a certain number of “home grown” academy players not only in first team squads, as suggested by UEFA, but the first team itself – irrespective of the nationality of those academy players. The hope would be that, as around 85% of academy players are currently English, this would translate into a technically more accomplished and larger pool of players available to the national squad. But, would it? What is the reality behind the quota idea? Certainly in the short term, it would be a constraint imposed on English teams throughout the league – perhaps affecting European aspirations most of all. Longer term, would it not simply shift the competition amongst clubs for recruiting players to ever younger targets? The prospect of multi millionaire 10 year olds looms larger!

These points are all worthy of debate, but the main driving force of this week’s issues raised by the PFA was a report, commissioned by them, which detailed the tremendous increase of non English players in the premiership. Since the advent of the club academy system, around 10 years ago, 120 young English men have graduated to first team football. In the same period, 617 foreign players have arrived in the premiership. A sobering statistic indeed. The report’s most surprising fact of all was that since the premiership started the number of English players involved has actually increased from 128 to 246 last season. A fact presumably explained by the modern need for much larger squads. Sadly, RTG doesn’t know how many of those 246 are considered first teamers. We suspect far less as a percentage, and in actual numbers, than in the premiership’s inaugural season.

The quota system, whilst worthy of debate, offers a too simplistic and narrow solution to England’s present woes. There are enormous cultural and educational issues that are greater even than football, which have a hugely significant impact on the development of players in this country. Why are there many thousands, yes thousands, of Brazilians playing professionally throughout the world outside of Brazil? The answer is that for the vast majority of those thousands, football is a way out of the violence and despair of the poverty stricken favellas. As Harry Redknapp mused on the answer to a question posed by a reporter, asking why he appeared to favour managing foreigners as opposed to English talent, he explained, the relative expense of signing English players was a problem, but that the most important point was the perceived lack of commitment from English kids. “Kids would rather be stuck indoors in front of their computer screens, playing games and surfing the ‘net. You just don’t see kids kicking the ball about in a park these days”.

Reclaim the Game – The Weekend’s Events

• Congratulations to Ryan Giggs for joining the exclusive group of players who have scored 100 league goals at the top level. He joins another 10 of the all time Manchester United greats which includes Best, Law and Charlton. Perhaps his most unwitting success was to be popular outside of Man United’s supporter base. No mean feat in itself.
• With all this talk of recession and credit squeezes, and with the transfer window opening in 3 weeks, the newspapers seem unsure of their scope for bullshit transfer stories. Still let’s hope for their sake that the FA doesn’t come up with an appointment to the England manager’s job. What on earth would they be able to speculate about?

Hat's Off, Take a Bow (or not)!

Player of the Week: Aiyegbeni Yakuba scoring his first hat-trick for Everton. Suddenly, people are beginning to wake up to the fact that he has been the most prolific striker in the premiership since his arrival on these shores. This excludes those that have departed the premiership (eg Henry van Nistelrooy), but still...

Hero of the Week: Ryan Giggs. As mentionned above.

Villain of the Week: Cristiano Ronaldo. Having elicited all the sympathy vote for his unjust booking and not winning a penalty last Monday night against Fulham, he spoils it all by doing the classic "there's a defender's leg, trip over it" to win one unjustly against Derby on Saturday. Curiously, he was defended by Andy Gray, who thought it was very "professional" and that he was "entitled" to go down. Nowadays, when Andy Gray says "professional", RTG hears "cheating".

Shock of the Week: Reading gaining their first win over a big four side (Liverpool). In this case, whilst the defeat of a much in-form Liverpool side was a surprise in itself, perhaps the biggest shock was that it was only their first win of this type. Reading's performances in their first two ever seasons in the top flight have been laudable as well as eye-catching.

Cliche of the Week: any simple, one sided argument that promises to right all that is wrong with English football. It just "aint" that simple.

Capping Foreigners Not the Answer to a Better England

Sir Alex Ferguson has come out in favour this week of a cap on the number of foreign players allowed in each Premiership squad. Given that only four of Manchester United's starting line up last Saturday were English (though four more than Arsenal it should be noted), it is likely that there is more than just a hint of tongue in cheek here from the maestro of the mind game. Sir Alex is a genius when it comes to winding up his rivals and this comment is more likely a reflection of a man with a growing confidence in his team's ability to see off challengers to United's Premiership title this year. Let's face it English football would be a sorrier place without him whether he is being serious or not.

But what would a cap actually achieve? Premiership football is where it is. It has attained a high standard and entertains supporters the World over. At least three of the big four usually qualify for the knockout stages of the Champions League and last year we had three semi-finalists. The point is we can't go back and lower the standard now. Putting an artificial restriction on the number of foreign players would almost certainly do exactly that. Rather than helping English players to get better, it would more likely create an artificial situation where clubs would have to pay a premium for them to keep their quota at the required level - whether they are good players or not.

There is an argument in Scottish football that when Sky pulled out of its coverage deal with the SPL, it meant that expensive foreign imports could no longer be afforded by the clubs. The result has been that more younger, home-grown players get to play at the highest level than would have done previously. Hence, the more impressive performance by the Scottish national team in the Euro 2008 qualifiers. It certainly seems a reasonable argument but if you actually look at the stats, there are no more Celtic or Rangers players in the Scotland team now than there were in 2002, 2004 or 2006 when Scotland finished third in their Euro and World qualifying groups. You could argue that perhaps there are more Hearts players present than there were and Hearts were certainly one of the clubs who went for East European imports in some numbers. But what is not mentioned is that two of Scotland's star performers in their current run, James McFadden and Duncan Fletcher, rarely start for their clubs. And while it has to be said that Scotland have certainly surprised everybody by their current position in what is a really tough group, they haven't actually qualified for anything yet.

At RTG we actually believe that football has moved on to take on the status of a truly global sport. There is, therefore, a big argument in favour of Premiership teams employing players from places like Africa as it might actually help to instil some sort of regulation in the movement of players. With the huge spoils that are currently on offer in leagues such as the English Premiership, the procurement of a young African player's signature by an agency and his subsequent movement overseas can be likened to something little short of people trafficking or slavery. If English football can help improve the transparency of deals involving non-European players then perhaps we can see an end to the farcical situation that occurred over the Tevez affair. Of course, FIFA-affiliated national football associations could all help in this with more co-operation, transparency and less corruption involving transfers across borders. But at RTG experience leads us to suspect that this will never happen.

If we care about the development of the game overseas, then there is also a lot to be said for developing players from China, India, Korea etc. in the best European leagues, to encourage the game abroad. Let RTG stress again, we are not against the operation of football as a business. It is too late now for it to be anything else. We just want to see that genuine competition is maintained.

It is true, that there is something frustrating about seeing players like Jermaine Pennant or David Bentley struggle to break into the Arsenal team when they are clearly more than capable of holding their own in the Premership. And perhaps their attitude, that Arsene Wenger could not seem to come to terms with, was borne more out of the frustration of being highly paid millionaires sat in the reserves week after week. But the real way to develop English players is not by artificially raising the value of home-grown players. English footballers would benefit more from a proper coaching and education programme backed by the FA. That way, they would earn the right to be in their club starting line-up as skillful and intelligent footballers rather than being there because the club has to pick them. While the responsibility to develop players rests solely with the clubs they will continue to operate in their own best interests and not those of the England national squad.

Reclaim the Game - The Week's Events

• It is early days and we shouldn't jump to conclusions just yet but there are worrying signs of yet more polarisation in the game - this time in the Champions League. Is it our imagination or do teams appear to be achieving qualification for the knockout stages earlier this year and does there appear to be a bigger prevalence of teams at the bottom of their group struggling to maintain the required standard? Let's hope not. The last thing Europe's elite competition needs is for the group stage to become a meaningless bunch of games simply to see the predictable 16 teams march comfortably through.
• Rumours have reached us that Steve Maclaren actually visited LA Galaxy, not to watch David Beckham (because he didn't even attend the game in fact), but to attend an interview for the vacant manager's position. Well, all we can say is jolly good luck with that Steve. Though sources today seem to suggest that Ruud Gullit is likely to be appointed very soon. Oh well!

FEC All Future for Michael Johnson.

Following his truly remarkable performances for Manchester City, Michael Johnson, has been hotly tipped by his new manager, Sven Goran Eriksson, as an FEC (future England captain). Always encouraging to unearth new promising talent for England, which presumably will mean the following career path:

1. a big money move to Chelsea where he will languish in the reserves until being transferred to West Ham or Newcastle in 2-3 years - where he will become an instant millionaire with his signing on fee;


2. his WAG will be pictured shopping in the Arnedale Centre wearing big sunglasses in the middle of winter and will follow it up by participation in a reality TV show (she won't win after a racist incident);


3. excessive media attention will turn a once promising footballer, into a believer of his own hype and importance - he will then miss a penalty in a shoot out with Croatia in the quarter finals of the Euro championship;


4. he will bring out an autobiography entitled “My Story” (of which, of course, at the tender age of 22, there basically isn’t one - well not one worth bothering to read at any rate);


5. a metatarsal injury, naturally.

Hopefully not true but, in all seriousness, how can we continue to try and talk objectively about improving the England side when the club v country v personal issues continue to be as prevalent as ever? Nobody can blame any person for wanting to earn big money to secure their financial future (or even a few plasma TV screens and a Bentley). Be realistic, we all would if we could. Being the richest league in the world does not guarantee the success of an England team. In fact, its very success in attracting financial resources is actually also its biggest weakness. We've said it in previous posts but while the FA continues to be more concerned with money than developing a strategy for the game, whatever talent Michael Johnson (or any other promising English player) possesses will still probably come to nothing. Ref: Scott Parker, Steve Sidwell, Sean Wright-Phillips, Wayne Bridge..........

Reclaim the Game - Weekend Events

• As if spilling the beans about your husband's penchant for wearing your underwear is not enough, Posh Spice also revealed that "used-to-be-a-good-footballer Spice" liked to prance around the kitchen declaring "I'm a Gay icon...I'm a Gay icon!". This careful cultivation of the pink pound has been somewhat undermined by Graeme Le Saux's autobiography which claimed that David Beckham had called him a "f***in' poof." Cue Beckham's agents quickly stepping in to deny the incident, citing Le Saux's need to hype up publicity for his new tome. Take's one to know one, we say.


• Brings tears to the eyes just imagining Beckham squeezing his gonads into a size zero thong!


• England 6 - Argentina 1. Who says England can't produce inspired performances in tournaments? So well done to the women for comprehensively showing up your underperforming, far out-earning brothers! Just win the bloody penalties for God's sake.


• Years ago the league tables were not even produced until a minimum of three games (at the very least) had been played. This season, after just two games, Manchester United were already out of the title race, Manchester City were reborn under Sven and Liverpool were likely champions. This weekend Arsenal are tipped for the top (despite having been universally written off) and Chelsea are has-beens. We've always believed the true story of any season starts at a minimum of 10 games or so. Sadly after five to six games of this season, the top four/five already appears to have a familiar ring.

Hats Off, Take a Bow (or not)

Player of the Week - Cesc Fabregas. Not just for his performance against Spurs but for leading Arsenal's charge to the top of the Premiership.

Villain of the week - Jose Mourinho. Referee/referee's assistant made a mistake. Asking for an apology is not going to get you two more points. Everybody makes mistakes (after all you stayed at Chelsea when you could have left with your head held high!).

Hero of the Week - Emile Heskey. Brought better balance and shape to an England team but, more importantly answered many of his critics (well at least for now). Anyway, now we know he's back in the frame as an England choice because he's broken his foot and can't play.

Cliche of the week - 'I don't know why everybody wrote them off so soon' (various).

Shock of the Week - Scotland. Great result but why are they once again setting themselves up for a big fall.