Audacity of Hope Dashed by Commercial Reality

The opening Saturday of the football season was once the most eagerly awaited day of any football supporter’s calendar. At three o’clock precisely on the given Saturday, at 46 different locations around the country, all 92 clubs embarked on their own history-making venture. The paucity of any football news during the summer months, with some broadsheets literally reporting no football news for weeks, only accentuated the drama of a new season. At many clubs, the first sight supporters had of a new summer signing was when he took to the field for the first match. Compare that buzz of anticipation with the modern game where 24 hour, 365 day football coverage has led to such over-exposure that we even know now what the club cat had for its dinner that morning. The mystery and suspense has all but disappeared. Staggered season starts for each league and first games spread over two to three days, to aid TV scheduling, has not lent itself well either to the crescendo of anticipation.

Back then, most home team match programmes would fuel the mindless optimism of both home and away fans. “Every team will be equal at least until 20 to five this afternoon”, they would intone. If the last season had been successful and a trophy (any trophy) had been won, you would bask in its reflected glory for a season or two as a ‘successful’ club. If last season had been woeful, then this one would surely be better, wouldn’t it? For nearly all supporters, there was hope that your team would challenge for honours or promotion, or, at the very least not to be embroiled in another relegation battle.

That was a time when the audacity of hope was reflected in the achievements, and failings, of individual clubs. In the 1960’s and 70’s, eleven different clubs won the English title, two of which were newly promoted, and only one club managed to defend successfully its title. This also included a run of seven different clubs winning the title in seven successive years in the early 1960’s. Contrast this to the four clubs who have won the past 19 top flight titles in England. Northampton Town took five years to gain promotion from the Football League basement to the top level, a similar feat performed, but executed with more success and longevity, by the Wimbledon team of the early 1980’s; culminating in Wimbledon becoming the only team to have won both FA Open and Amateur cup competitions. ‘Smaller clubs’, in particular, were able to foster these hopes, as Derby, Ipswich, QPR and Nottingham Forest’s, among others, proved beyond doubt. Supporters’ dreams therefore were more than just fashioned from pipes.

Nowadays, most supporters are forced to be more realistic about their expectations. After all, they’ve had their team’s prospects raked over and rated for virtually the entire summer by an armada of pundits and writers, not to mention the millions ranting and rambling on the internet (ourselves included). Supporters can see a couple of billionaires spend unlimited amounts of money in attempting to buy honours. A handful of other clubs attempt a futile effort at parity but all are having to deal with the trickle down inflationary effect of these billionaires. More and more clubs are getting into debt in an attempt to maintain their competitiveness. Since the inception of the Premier League, 53 Football League clubs have gone into receivership: 13 of them following relegation from the top level.

Apart from supporters of the two clubs who benefit from their owners’ largesse and maybe a handful of others (for now), most should be worrying about whether their club will still be in existence in a few years time. Gone are the days when supporters could experience that first day of hope beyond hope unless you’re one of those fans that relies on your club finding a billionaire benefactor. No true supporter could surely harbour that dream which is as much a form of cheating as any doped up athlete pounding around a track. The inequities of first the Premier League compared to the Football League, and second, the Champions League compared to the ‘others’ in the Premier League, have created financial chasms that not even the most optimistic of supporters can ever dream of crossing.

And thus we have ended up with a competition where the inevitability of a Chelsea/Manchester City duopoly in the Premier League – not withstanding the sheer bloody mindedness of a certain knighted Scot – will prevail. Add in the possible levels of debt that newly promoted clubs must take on in any vague hope of competing and it’s easy to see why that opening day excitement has vanished, as success and glory have been replaced by more money requirements and more financial insecurities. One season you’re cheering on a cup win, the next you’re battling relegation with points deducted. One season you’re celebrating promotion, two seasons later you’ve had to sell half your team because you can’t afford the inflated wages on lower league revenues. Not much to dream about…..Help us to allow every supporter to dream again. Reclaim the Game.

Sexism Exposes a Lack of Intelligence on Wider Issues

When David Beckham received the BBC Sports Lifetime Achievement award in December 2010, it was hard not to argue that this was more a victory for David Beckham’s PR people and their friends in the media, rather than an objective analysis of his sporting contribution in his still young life. Compared with some of the previous winners: Sir Alex Ferguson, Seve Ballesteros, Martina Navratilova and Pele, amongst others, Beckham’s achievements, so far, have been pretty limited. In a similar vein, prior to the 2010 World Cup, Talksport Radio appeared to make it their raison d’être to get Beckham into the England squad – and they were widely supported by a multitude of TV pundits. It was probably just as well, but unfortunate for the injured Beckham, that the England Manager was spared the wrath of populist media opinion by not having to make that decision.

No question he is popular, a great, but not world class, footballer and, according to RTG’s own sources, a genuinely nice person – if a little lacking in the brain department. However, his has been a remarkable public relations turnaround from the totally unfair bile and condemnation he received following his, and England’s, dismissal from the 1998 World Cup.

RTG has no problem with self satisfying award ceremonies, or popularity contests. Issues arise, however, when lazy TV and radio pundits, through lack of knowledge and thorough analysis, jump onto a popular bandwagon to apply pressure for their views to be acted upon. The aforementioned are just some examples of the media influencing, or attempting to influence, football irrationally. There are numerous other converse situations of players being branded as ‘divers’ or troublemakers that have subsequently influenced referees’ decisions. Referees have been suspended or downgraded because of media pundits, who, with the benefit of multiple camera angles and hours of hindsight, have condemned the poor souls to ridicule and humiliation for the benefit of filling TV airtime. There have also been players who have been punished purely based on the attentions of the media, whilst others more deserving have escaped because …well ... who knows why?

There was no real shock in the news that some presenters of a football show on Sky TV inadvertently made some sexist remarks. There was little surprise, also, in the fact that they were stupid enough to allow themselves to be recorded making those inappropriate comments. The big surprise, to RTG, at least, is that it took an incident of this kind for people to finally sit up and question the real contribution of the likes of Andy Gray and Richard Keys to football in the first place.

With all due respect to political correctness, the real issue was not just the ignorant ramblings of a self-aggrandising ex-footballer and his sycophantic side-kick, but also the question of why such men and notable others are being hugely enriched to deliver their lazy, clichéd, one-dimensional view of the game in the first place (apparently Andy Gray was on a £1.7 million salary).

It is quite possible that ‘dark forces’ were at work in Gray’s dismissal. His action against the News of the World in the phone tapping scandal was never likely to sit well with the owner of News International, Rupert Murdoch, who also happens to be the major shareholder in BSkyB. There is every chance he was the victim of one almighty stitch-up. But Sky’s constant arrogance in talking up its contribution to football in England and their sensationalist self-promotion had rubbed off on Gray to the point where, while he really believed he was something of an aficionado on the modern game, his analysis was predictably repetitive and focused purely on picking on the low hanging fruit rather than talking intelligently about the issues in the game.

It’s too easy, after all, to label a player as a diver or a cheat by highlighting him from several different camera angles, than it is to, say, learn the modern offside rule properly (something he belittled female assistant referee Sian Massey for, when it was he who struggled with its interpretation over the years). Did Gray ever criticise the structure and management of the game in this country? Or the money being pumped into the game by billionaires that totally distorts the competitiveness of football as a sport? Has he ever mentioned FIFA, except in his, and Sky’s, self-serving interest in promoting more reliance on TV replays?

Keys was just a below-average presenter who lucked out when Sky won the rights to monopolise Premier League football coverage and simply played the role of arse-licking hanger-on to Gray, feeding him the right lines and questions to make sure his over-sensationalised opinions could be aired to maximum effect.

So what? You may ask: so a few players/referees are inconsistently demonised by TV. Does it really matter? In RTG’s opinion it does. Firstly, we, the supporters have to pay for the pundits through the bloated Sky subscription fees - money that would be better spent on lowering the subscription fee or being invested in grass-roots football.

But there are other forces at work here. These guys influence the game in other more worrying ways. The most professional and impartial of referees can’t help but be swayed by the media, even subconsciously, if they are shown enough on TV. As discussed earlier, highlight a referee’s own mistakes often enough from the comfort of your commentary box and you can put immense pressure on him (or her!) not to give decisions a certain way.

If you doubt the influence of the TV presenter, just look at Italy where Aldo Biscardi hosted the programme ”Il Processo di Biscardi” (Biscardi’s Trial) for 26 years. The programme was considered among the most influential in Italian football but was tainted by publication of phone taps of conversations between him and former Juventus Managing Director, Luciano Moggi, in 2006 at the height of the Italian match-fixing scandal. Moggi influenced the choice of guests on the show, the choice of matches to be analysed, which incidents were to be analysed, the tone of the criticism and even the results of viewer polls. All with the aim of painting Juventus in a better light.

RTG is not suggesting that either Gray, or any other pundit for that matter, was up to the same underhand activity. Although RTG still finds it most curious as to the reasons for Gray’s fawning praise of the early Abramovich regime at Chelsea, where they could scarcely put a foot wrong, either on or off the field. But we shouldn’t take it for granted that this could never happen in the English game or that it hasn’t already. There are huge sums of money in football today. Teams are owned by billionaires who are used to using their money and power to get what they want. We’ll never know if there were other factors involved in the 2007 deal that saw Referee, Rob Styles’ company being awarded the contract to pave Roman Abramovich’s driveway. It was reported but did not receive the scrutiny that it should have done. And let’s not underestimate how reliant the media is on feeding off its own share of the football spoils.

It doesn’t seem unreasonable that we, the paying public, should expect the highest journalistic standards from regular front-line presenters, doing what is, after all, a journalists’ job. They should be guardians of the sport and not a mouthpiece for the businesses feeding off it. We want matches not only to be reviewed consistently, impartially and knowledgeably, but also have the pressing issues that affect all football supporters aired more widely.

Too often it appears that pundits do their research in ‘Hello’ and ‘Ok’ magazines and not in the FA’s rule book. David Beckham as next England manager anyone?

The Big TV Football Rip Off

It is 18 years since the Premiership took over from the old Football League Division One as the top tier league in English football. That was the point that Sky Sports won the bid to show live games each week and effectively changed the game in England forever. If you listen to Sky Sports commentators, other sections of the media (usually those that benefit financially from Sky through advertising and sponsorship), and even a significant number of fans, you’ll hear nothing but gushing praise for Sky, its ‘wonderful’ coverage and the huge benefits it has brought to English football The actual truth is that Sky needed football far more than football needed Sky.

RTG recognises that Sky has contributed a significant sum of money into the English game. The original deal in 1992 was worth £191 million over five years. The most recent deal starting at the beginning of this, the 2010/11 season is worth £1.72 billion. However, for all the plaudits Sky receives for its contribution to the game in this country in making it the richest league in the world, this money has just gone straight into the pockets of agents and in players’ salaries. Precious little of it has gone towards developing the game at grass roots level. Few supporters would argue that the England team has grown steadily worse during this period and there are fewer English players playing at the top level than there has ever been.

Those of us who grew up in the days when the only live domestic football on TV were the FA Cup Final and England v Scotland, can remember the excitement that was generated when live football league games began to be shown in the 1983/84 season. There was one match live per week and coverage alternated between ITV and BBC. RTG accepts that we can’t go backwards now, but that was probably enough to satisfy the needs of the average TV watching football supporter. In the modern era, where there is so much more live football available, this model, that forces us to watch the games they choose, at times that they also choose (often inconvenient to the travelling spectator), is not meeting the needs of supporters. For this ‘privilege’ we are forced to pay in excess of £50 per month to watch (probably overpaid) ex-players sit around a table analysing controversial incidents from 20 different angles interspersed with as many commercial breaks as is humanly possible. After which we then subsidise minority sports like Nascar Racing and Darts to fill up the airwaves when football isn’t on.

Supporters might have thought there was some light at the end of the tunnel when, in 2007, the European Union decided Sky’s monopoly on football on TV was unfair and forced them to open up certain packages to other companies. As usual, when politicians get involved, they messed it up. What happened was that supporters had to pay yet more money to watch every game in which their club was shown live on TV, while matches were scheduled at even more inconvenient kick off times.

In years to come, people will look back on this era in amazement that we were ever prepared to go along with it. It will rank up there alongside the astonishment felt by younger generations now that TV used to actually shut down during the daytime. The fact that pubs in England are being forced into the courts by Sky for showing games live on TV, via foreign satellite channels, at 3pm on a Saturday afternoon, shows that supporters in the modern era want to watch their own team live, or the match of their choice, not that of the TV channel. That’s something that RTG believes supporters would be happy to pay for and could be done, whilst generating equally as much money to the benefit of all clubs and the grass roots of the sport. We know there will be problems in implementing what supporters need rather than what they are being served up but it is better that it is controlled by supporters’ needs rather than those of the TV channels. This goes towards illustrating what RTG has always advocated which is that TV is wagging the football dog rather than the other way around.


“I think it’s unjust. I think it’s a greedy private company trying to dictate to the small people what they can and cannot do, purely for profit. The law needs changing. If I don’t fight who is going to fight?...

...If I wanted to go and buy a car, I could go to any garage I like. Me, as a publican, if I want to show football, I can only go to the Sky garage, and have to pay 10 times the price of anybody else [in Europe]. I don’t believe that’s fair.”

Karen Murphy, Landlady of the Red, White and Blue pub Southsea, Hampshire, 5th October 2010

We’re being held to ransom and it is time that the myth that, supposedly, lucrative football TV deals have been a revelation for English football and a real bonus for supporters, is finally put to bed. We’re paying all this money, so give us what we want. At the very least, the powers that be could ask us how we would like to watch our football on TV rather than giving us Hobson’s choice. Without us there is no professional football and as long as this status quo is maintained we’re just going to be ripped off yet again.

The Keeper
....still doesn't understand offside!

The Keeper was one of the few who didn’t believe that Wayne Rooney would ever leave Manchester. It’s long been known that Wazza is one of those gentle souls who like the comfort and security of knowing that a loving family is close at hand. Close by too are the familiar hookers (young and old), the old watering holes and urination spots…….Still the Keeper is sure that United’s lack of ambition will be more than compensated by the doubling, or trebling of his pay.

Yet more news of financial transgressions by FIFA officials were revealed by a Sunday Times newspaper sting, alleging that world cup votes could be bought from voting FIFA officials. For once Sepp Blatter has sprung into action, suspending the officials concerned and ordering a full investigation. The Keeper does recall previous FIFA investigations being conducted by FIFA themselves. The old jokes about Dracula investigating a theft at the blood bank, or, Bernie Madoff looking into Wall Street financial irregularities, spring quickly to mind.

Apparently, John W Henry’s wife, Linda Pizzutti, was the driving force behind her husband’s successful takeover of Liverpool Football Club. Her pestering of her husband to buy was inspired by her love of the Beatles. Subsequently, after doing a tour of the city and discovering Abbey Road wasn’t actually in Liverpool, she’s changed her mind!

The Keeper used the recent international break for a spot of his own R and R in sunnier climes. Imagine the Keeper’s surprise when he bumped into a less than sober Joe Hart dancing on the table of a Spanish bar. This less than 36 hours prior to the game. Still, after the deadly dull offering of the England team those few hours later, the Keeper was happy to give up his Club England seat for a cold beer on a beach. Clearly, Joe Hart was longing for the same.

Hey Gaffa! Whose Side Are You On?

Much has been written, both by RTG and other parts of the media, about how modern footballers no longer seem able to relate to the supporters who come to watch them each week and, effectively, pay their wages. RTG could offer up a great deal of evidence of events in recent times that would back this up and you’d probably have heard most of it all before. But what of managers? As the corporate animal slowly but surely devours the game of football are we now beginning to see the inevitable loss of respect for supporters from the team bosses themselves?

Supporters traditionally have always treated the manager as custodian of the team’s interests. He has always been a figurehead who fights the chairman for more money to boost the squad and, when their club was successful, you could hear no wrong said from the fans on the terraces.

The relationship between club chairmen and managers was always an uneasy one. Brian Clough was famous for criticising chairmen and it was indeed the breakdown of his relationship with Sam Longson at Derby County that led to his resignation in 1973. It is now well documented that Clough himself was no saint but he was adamant that he had deserved better treatment for what he had done for the club and its supporters.

Clough’s battles, of course, were in the days when the club chairman was usually a local successful businessman. The huge sums of money involved in football today have changed club governance immeasurably and, in RTG’s opinion, the relationship between manager and supporter is therefore beginning to look very different.

Ask any Manchester United fan and Sir Alex Ferguson is, quite rightly, a legend. He has built a dynasty at United turning them from a there-or-thereabouts team into perennial winners. And he has done it through building new team after new team.

"We don't want the club in anyone else's hands. I have always tried to the bridge between the club and the fans. I have tried to support the fans in a lot of their pleas and causes. It's important for the club to recognise the fans. When the plc started, there were grave doubts about it - I had them myself - but I think the supporters have come round to that. There's a stronger rapport between the club and the fans than there's ever been."

Sir Alex Ferguson, November 2004

When the Glazers arrived, United fans protested at the huge debts that they heaped on the club where once there were reasonable profits—profits that were spent on the team and facilities for supporters. Supporters looked to their talisman to come out and state his own disapproval regarding what was happening to the club. Surely, Sir Alex himself would be concerned at the impending money squeeze that would inevitably occur. But he remained diplomatically silent other than to state his disregard for the fans who formed FC United of Manchester, claiming they were self-publicists and had no real interest in saving Manchester United. It was, he said, more an act in their own self-interests.

"I've got close friends who've been working with me here for 15 years. They come first in all of this….If you don't like it, go and watch Chelsea."

Sir Alex Ferguson, August 2005,

And then, disappointingly, two seasons ago, to the chagrin of the United faithful, he came out in support of the Glazers management of the club. “They've been great owners”, he said. 'They have supported me every way I've asked them.”

Last season, following the departure of Christiano Ronaldo for a record £80M, saw the rise of the green and old campaign, a campaign that RTG wholeheartedly supports for its stance against the use of a football club as a cash cow to prop up their ailing business interests in a foreign country after having used the club’s own money to buy it in the first place. Surely now, Sir Alex would at least express some degree of concern about lack of spending money and perhaps some sympathy for supporters who had seen their star player sold for a record transfer fee with very little coming back in the way of class players to strengthen the squad.

But no. Sir Alex continued to maintain that his squad was good enough and he came out and, earlier this year, criticised the green and gold campaign. He effectively dismissed those behind, what is a worthy and heartfelt campaign, as idiots. United did, in fact, secure second in the Premier League last season but the signs were there that some cracks were beginning to appear.

Before you start to think, where is RTG going with this? That you’d be more than happy if your club were to finish second in the Premier League! That is not the issue. The point is that, what should be a fantastic football legacy left not only to the club by Sir Alex, but also to English football itself, is in danger of being slowly but surely squandered away. And why? So a few American businessmen can pay off their debts back home and continue to draw funds from what is their only cash generating concern. The objective of the business has clearly changed to a distinctly non-footballing agenda.

Sir Alex was reputedly paid upwards of £3.6M in 2008. RTG can only assume it is more than that now. If he comes out and criticises the Glazers, where does that leave him? He seems to be one of these people that supports socialism right up to the point that it leaves him worse off. He’ll be OK. He’ll retire, when he chooses to do so, in a more than comfortable state. United supporters, and yes, English football as a whole, will be left with the Glazers and the mess.

If this sounds like a direct attack on Sir Alex Ferguson, it is not meant to be. RTG just wishes to illustrate that he is the most successful manager and United are the biggest supported club in the world. You could equally take the case of Arsenal who, since moving to a bigger stadium in order to supposedly ‘compete’, have won nothing since. Yet, Arsene Wenger continues to claim transfer fees are there if he wants them. Nobody really knows the truth. No, the corporate interests and wealthy billionaire owners have seen to it that our managers are now well and truly at the mercy of the money god.

We already have alienation of the players and the supporters. Signs are that we may soon have managers and supporters alienated too. What next? Complete alienation of the clubs and its supporters? We don’t like you lot anymore. We can survive with our TV money and the supporters abroad. Season ticket to Dubai United anyone?

The Keeper

...he's punching above his weight

News of an almighty row from the American National Football League (NFL) has reached the Keeper. Apparently a former Miss Universe was subjected to ‘abuse’ by male players when doing the post match (sorry “game”) round of interviews in the changing (sorry “locker”) room on behalf of an obscure sports channel. The NFL has long prided itself on having equal access for all reporters of either gender or sexual orientation to players – extending to ignoring any issues arising from naked men running around flicking wet towels at each other, or for that matter, the “qualification” of said reporters. The Keeper is thankful that no such access exists here. No, not because the Keeper is loathe to flash women (after all, it’s legal!). But the spectre of Madams Balding, Barker, Irvine et al chasing naked men around with a large microphone would leave both parties, well…not worthy of fantasy. Anyway, if rumours are to be believed, they’d be a lot happier hanging around in female professional tennis changing rooms. However, it did make the Keeper wonder if the NFL’s politically correct approach extended the same privileges to males in female locker rooms?

Talking of being thankful, or not in this case, the Keeper was disappointed to see Alan Shearer back on the MOTD couch last Saturday. However, the Keeper was thankful to be distracted from his tiresome repetition of clichés, masquerading as analysis, by being mesmerised by his patchy bald pate, resembling something like a football pitch from the 1960’s. So mesmerised in fact, that he even missed Alan’s uninformed remark: “Ben Arfa – whoever ‘eard of ‘im”; referring to Newcastle United’s France International, Hatem Ben Arfa – five times French League Champion, with two different clubs, and regular on the Champions League scene over the last five years. Certainly contradicts the old saying that goes “grass doesn’t grow on a busy thoroughfare”! Not busy, just lazy.

Now that the England team establishment have stated that the next England manager will be English, jockeying for position in the role has been initiated, with several managers putting themselves forward. Sam Allardyce made his intentions clear by telling the media that he would win all the domestic honours, at least, if he was in charge at either Inter or Real Madrid. Knowing his predilection for the technical side of the game – through lap top analysis and blue tooth earpiece communications, the Keeper wonders if he has been drawing the wrong conclusions from playing too much with his EA Sports Champions League play station game. Besides which Sam, modern European managers usually have a command of several languages, not just a poor command of one!

On a serious note, the Keeper’s least favourite rogue administrator, the less than honourable Jack Warner, FIFA vice President and President of CONCACAF, is still managing to cock a snook to both the Trinidad & Tobago Players and the country’s legal system. Despite the fact that the T & T courts have ordered him to release the funds to pay players who participated in the 2006 world cup, he’s still refusing to do so. This from a man who was fined hundreds of thousands of dollars by FIFA for touting tickets and for enriching his own relative’s travel company at that tournament. The fact that Sepp Blatter keeps insisting that “Jack” is a paragon of virtue and all round top bloke, says more about Blatter than it does about Warner.

A Phoney Phase to a Phoney Competition – Part Two

Last week RTG highlighted the total distortion of competition within the Premier League caused by the unrestricted spending of Manchester City and Chelsea. RTG also highlighted how this distortion is putting additional financial demands on the rest of the Premiership. So much so, that promotion can now be viewed increasingly as a poisoned chalice, with financial implosion and further relegation becoming the norm for those clubs failing to maintain their premiership status beyond a season or two. As RTG writes, recently relegated Hull City is believed to be on the brink of administration following a host of other clubs whose recent history has included a period in the top flight.

RTG believes the time has come to impose financial controls on this unbridled distortion. Yes, UEFA has announced rules that impose some limited constraints, but as RTG has previously pointed out before, these are very limited and will allow the continual subsidy of clubs living beyond their means until at least the 2019/2020 season! Also, they will continue to allow the purchase of clubs via leveraged buyouts, thus waving in more Glazers, Hicks and Gillettes into the English game.

Salomon Kalou made the back pages last week by asserting that Manchester City won’t be able to buy the league title. That, coming from a player whose team has already had around £700 million of subsidies from a Russian Oligarch, says much about the hypocrisy and lunacy pervading the upper tier of English football. And there’s more to come. Since Abramovich’s subsidies, Chelsea have finished in the top two in each of his six seasons as owner, winning three titles – this for a team that had finished in the top two only once in the previous 98 years. Sorry Salomon, you really can buy the title and you can buy success. You may not be able to do it by the Real Madrid ‘Galactico’ method – which in the end is more to do with a vanity ‘fantasy league’ project, than a serious football-winning team building exercise.

People have argued that the additional billions that the game has received from oligarchs and oil sheikhs have made the Premiership a more exciting league, attracting the best talent in the world. RTG argues differently: the additional money has led to absurd transfer and player salary inflation, which has only fuelled the disparity between the rich two and the rest. Yes, Manchester United, Liverpool and Arsenal have been able to challenge Chelsea in recent seasons, but these challenges are fading and, arguably Manchester United, without Ronaldo, would not have been able to prevent Chelsea from winning all titles since Abramovich appeared on the scene. As it stands, with UEFA’s so called financial constraints, the title for the foreseeable future will be a contest between City and Chelsea – with the rest making up the annual fodder for these two. It will also mean a lot more clubs going into administration and ruin.

No, the time is now for the Premiership to impose unilaterally its own controls to prevent not only the massive subsidies to clubs, but the obscene leveraged buy-outs which will bring ruin to both Manchester United and Liverpool. In Liverpool’s case, it already has done. Yes, it may mean the ‘best’ talent in the world may bypass the Premiership (and arguably they are doing so already) and it may mean that the Premiership’s recent ‘domination’ (according to the pundits) of the Champions League would end in the short term, but it would make for a far better competition and safeguard the future of clubs for their supporters.

So sign up to RTG to help get a proper football competition! 

The Keeper

…still waiting for the call from City! 

If the Keeper sounds a bit distracted this week then many apologies but it’s down to this new shirt they’ve got him wearing for the new season. It itches like hell. The days when the old green cotton jersey was washed and laid out on the bed in August have long since departed. Now it’s a question of making sure he gets used to at least three different luminous coloured nylon affairs. It used to be the case that the Keeper only had to go through this unpleasant process every few years but actually it seems to be a yearly occurrence now. In fact 18 from 20 Premier League clubs have changed their first team kit again this year so why should the Keeper get off scot free? At least Arsenal and Manchester United have ‘gone green’ by claiming their new replica kits are made from recycled plastic bottles. This does not unfortunately result in the shirts being cheaper to buy for the average football supporter but from a manufacturing production viewpoint, it makes perfect sense. After quenching their raging thirst in the oppressive heat of the sweatshop, a Chinese worker will be able to throw their plastic water bottle in the skip next to their work space safe in the knowledge that it will be back in front of them in a matter of days to be hewn expertly into a Nike football shirt.

Speaking of recycling in sport, the Olympic Stadium for 2012 is the first ever that is apparently totally recyclable. It is designed so that the top tier can be removed and recycled to leave a 25,000 capacity athletics stadium. Or, as talk has it, West Ham may take it over and have their own brand new home ground ready for 2012-13 presumably at taxpayers’ expense. But this doesn’t necessarily mean the recycling doesn’t have to happen. Just think how many peek-a-boo latex bras, crotch-less skin tight knickers and synthetic rubber Rampant Rabbits David Sullivan and David Gold will manage to make out of the recycled running track when it’s ripped up. 

No opportunity for Eduardo to don the reconstituted coke bottles as he thanked his old club Arsenal and departed for Shakhtar Donetsk. The unusual part of his transfer was that he had to learn Ukrainian as part of the deal. This serves as a stark reminder to the Keeper as to why so few English players travel to foreign climes to ply their trade. In three years at Lazio, the best Gazza managed was “uno birra per favour chief” (belch), while in the same time period in Madrid, David Beckham got at best to “grassy arse” and sticking an ‘o’ on the end of any English word he knows (of which, let’s face it, there aren’t that many). The Keeper wonders how many times the phrase “yer know o” was quoted in post-match interviews to the Spanish media.

Closer to home, the saga of Liverpool football club drags on and on. After last season when it seemed that a few scribblings on the back of a fag packet were enough to prove oneself worthy of buying Portsmouth, it could take many months for prospective buyers to prove their own suitability to buy the Merseyside giant while they, in turn, carry out their own due diligence. If this proves too much of a financial strain on Gillette and Hicks it may be that they will default on their loans and Royal Bank of Scotland, effectively a state owned bank, will end up running Liverpool FC. While opposition football supporters the length and breadth of the country have, for many years, taken the piss out of Liverpool folk and their supposed reliance on benefits from the state, having their football club relying on taxpayers’ handouts is surely taking it a bit too far.

What Do We See Through the Transfer Window?

Sometimes when RTG ponders the wrongs in football today, we wonder if maybe we’re just spoiling it for the countless people out there who still enjoy the game and simply want to appreciate it for the spectacle that it is. There’s no doubt that there are still many things about the modern football era that are worth praising. But, too often we find ourselves viewing events that seem to be nothing short of destructive to the long-term future of the game and it is hard to be anything other than pessimistic and critical. Monday night’s transfer window deadline did nothing to change our view that English football continues to plunge further and further into the abyss.

As RTG writes this article, Manchester City has accepted a bid from Abu Dhabi United Group to take over the club from Thaksin Shinawatra. In all likelihood this is a more positive move for City than sticking with Thailand’s deposed ex-Premier, given the reported skeletons in the closet. This time last year, many commentators and City supporters were delighted with Shinawatra’s purchase of the club in that it might represent a chance for City to achieve the standards their fans have long waited for and for them to finally challenge United for honours on an even playing field. RTG were less than optimistic about this situation and our viewpoint appears to have been vindicated.

One year later, City supporters are once again delighted that control of the club has passed into new, and wealthier, hands giving them, potentially, the biggest injection of cash into a club since Roman Abramovich took over Chelsea. Despite still being in due diligence, they have broken the English transfer record with the purchase of Robinho for a reported £32.5M from right under Chelsea’s nose. At the same time, they had reportedly had a similar bid for Berbatov accepted by Spurs—a deal that was never likely to happen. RTG can only speculate as to whether this was a deliberate ploy to make Manchester United pay over the odds for the Bulgarian striker. If the “Anyone But Uniteds” out there see this as a cause to smile you shouldn’t. Football is a sport and healthy rivalry should be about competition on the field not trying to put your rivals out of business. Despite what you may think, a Premier League with no Manchester United is no Premier League at all.

In all, the whole transfer window saga did not paint English football in a very good light. Why the English media, and especially Sky Sports News, feel they have their own role to play in this by constantly fuelling rumours based on little or no evidence is beyond RTG. The entire process appears designed to squeeze out yet more money in favour of a few beneficiaries rather than benefiting football as an entertainment and a sport. At a time when three clubs are languishing at the bottom of League 2 with negative points, following administration proceedings, this constant speculation about whether a player loves his club or would be flattered to play for another in order to get a few more digits added to their weekly salary haul is utterly obscene.

So used are we now to this increasingly over-egged August shenanigans that it is easy to forget that the transfer window only started in 2002 after our old friend Sepp Blatter conceived it as a way of preventing players walking out on their contracts at any time. The European Union's competition commissioner, Mario Monti, proposed at the time that transfer fees be outlawed entirely because they were against EU regulations for fair competition and free trading across Europe.

It was also suggested at the time that having no transfer fees would effectively put clubs in the lower leagues out of business, as they rely on selling their few home-grown gems in order to pay the bills. Consequently, the whole game signed up to a compromise that has sought to escalate transfer fees way out of proportion and has further polarised the gap between the haves and have-nots. The now desperate need to sign big players before the end of August, and the money it creates, has allowed the Premier League the licence to watch our national game be gradually flogged off to the highest bidder while genuine competition within the top level of the game gets ever-more scarce. Meanwhile, more and more clubs at the lower levels are struggling to simply stay afloat.

While Arsene Wenger attempts to claim the moral high ground by refusing to get involved in this annual end of August bun fight, RTG suspects that he is really just entrenching himself in his beliefs in order to fend off criticism from Arsenal supporters who feel the side has under-achieved in recent years. It is quite possible that he is merely sounding off in frustration at his inexperienced team who will, once again, struggle to compete for honours over the course of a season. Is it not the case that, even if he were to produce another championship winning team, many of his home-developed players would simply use it as a platform to jump ship for higher wages elsewhere? RTG strongly suspects that, if Arsenal win nothing significant again this season, Wenger may well take his skills to a new challenge. Sir Alex Ferguson, in contrast, knew that he needed to buy a striker and had no option but to pay way over the odds or be left with a squad that, potentially, might already be out of the running come the January window.

It is not RTG’s goal to be the harbinger of doom. Quite the opposite in fact. Were it not for the fact that we believe in the power of the supporter’s voice, and the desire to see the game continue, we would not be writing this blog. But Monday’s events seem to reinforce the fact that the game is on a collision course to disaster. Competiton and sound administration, at all levels, are essential to the continued enjoyment and longevity of the game. Otherwise, why not just put the Premier League trophy up for auction to the highest bidder at the beginning of the season and have done with it. Supporters exist in sufficient numbers to have a voice. And that must be heard now, more than ever, if football is not to be swallowed up by the greed and short-sightedness of people who seek only to use the loyalty of supporters to line their pockets.